CYBERSECURITYTRACKER
Permanent story citation

FTC says ‘sextortion’ protection companies deceived customers about services

This page keeps the story as Cybersecurity Tracker first published it. If the tracker later corrects it, the correction appears below the original and never replaces it.

Back to newsStory 10159

As cited

Copy frozen at (site build).

regulatory

FTC says ‘sextortion’ protection companies deceived customers about services

The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit in October 2026 against Dmitry Belkin and 12 of his companies for defrauding sextortion victims of at least $60 million. The businesses advertised digital forensics and sextortion protection services on Google, YouTube, and X but failed to deliver promised services, fabricated evidence of threat resolution, and pressured customers into additional payments through exploitative telemarketing scripts. The FTC alleges the companies also denied refund requests, used fake reviews and Better Business Bureau impersonation to suppress complaints, and employed aggressive scripts designed to amplify victims' fears about their personal and legal consequences.

Why it matters: Organizations and individuals responding to sextortion threats need to recognize these fraudulent protection services to avoid victimization by Belkin's companies, which specifically target vulnerable populations through deceptive advertising and coercive sales tactics.

VendorsGoogle
Source published
First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Correction

Correction recorded as of .

regulatory

FTC says ‘sextortion’ protection companies deceived customers about services

The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit in October 2026 against Dmitry Belkin and 12 of his companies for defrauding sextortion victims of at least $60 million. The businesses advertised digital forensics and sextortion protection services on Google, YouTube, and X but failed to deliver promised services, fabricated evidence of threat resolution, and pressured customers into additional payments through exploitative telemarketing scripts. The FTC alleges the companies also denied refund requests, used fake reviews and Better Business Bureau impersonation to suppress complaints, and employed aggressive scripts designed to amplify victims' fears about their personal and legal consequences.

Why it matters: Organizations and individuals responding to sextortion threats need to recognize these fraudulent protection services to avoid victimization by Belkin's companies, which specifically target vulnerable populations through deceptive advertising and coercive sales tactics.

VendorsGoogle
Source published
First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Glossary