CYBERSECURITYTRACKER
Permanent story citation

Sovereignty vs. security: Microsoft’s Roger Halbheer says you’re asking the wrong question

This page keeps the story as Cybersecurity Tracker first published it. If the tracker later corrects it, the correction appears below the original and never replaces it.

Back to newsStory 11013

As cited

Copy frozen at (site build).

government policy

Sovereignty vs. security: Microsoft’s Roger Halbheer says you’re asking the wrong question

Microsoft's Customer Security Officer Roger Halbheer contends that digital sovereignty should be framed as a security problem rather than a political one. He argues that organizations underestimate detection speed, overlook the expense of moving workloads to on-premises infrastructure, and should make risk decisions at the workload level instead of seeking blanket independence.

Why it matters: Enterprise boards and compliance teams making sovereignty decisions need to weigh operational security costs and detection latency against independence goals to avoid expensive on-premises deployments that do not reduce actual risk.

VendorsMicrosoft
Source published
First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Glossary