CYBERSECURITYTRACKER
TRACKING6,506 stories in this site build1,309 vulnerability news stories in this site build
Permanent story citation

Claude AI Just Cracked a Post-Quantum Test Scheme and Found a Faster 7-Round AES Attack

This page keeps the story as Cybersecurity Tracker first published it. If the tracker later corrects it, the correction appears below the original and never replaces it.

Back to newsStory 3383

As cited

Copy frozen at (site build).

research

Claude AI Just Cracked a Post-Quantum Test Scheme and Found a Faster 7-Round AES Attack

Anthropic's Claude AI model contributed to deriving a full key-recovery attack against the HAWK-256 post-quantum signature scheme and accelerated a seven-round AES-128 attack by 200 to 800 times. The HAWK attack leverages an previously unexploited symmetry in the underlying lattice, with a reference implementation completing in approximately three hours and 42 minutes on a 96-core server.

Why it matters: Cryptography practitioners should monitor HAWK-256 adoption and AES-7 security assumptions; faster attacks on reduced-round AES suggest accelerated timelines for evaluating cryptographic resilience, though neither HAWK-256 nor seven-round AES are standard deployments.

Source published
First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Correction

Correction recorded as of .

research

Claude AI Just Cracked a Post-Quantum Test Scheme and Found a Faster 7-Round AES Attack

No summary had been written when this copy was frozen.

First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Correction

Correction recorded as of .

research

Claude AI Just Cracked a Post-Quantum Test Scheme and Found a Faster 7-Round AES Attack

Anthropic reported that its Claude Mythos Preview model assisted researchers in deriving a complete key‑recovery attack against the HAWK‑256 post‑quantum signature scheme. The same model also revealed a method that speeds up attacks on seven‑round AES‑128 by a factor of 200 to 800 compared with prior approaches. Anthropic released a proof‑of‑concept implementation that estimates the HAWK attack would run in roughly three hours and forty‑two minutes on a 96‑core server.

Why it matters: Organizations using HAWK‑256 or seven‑round AES‑128 should evaluate their exposure to these new key‑recovery techniques and consider migrating to stronger, vetted alternatives.

Source published
First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Glossary