As cited
Copy frozen at (site build).
vulnerabilities
Is Your AppSec Program Built to Close the OWASP Top 10 2025 Coverage Gap?
The OWASP Top 10 2025 update introduces new attack vectors that many existing AppSec programs do not adequately cover, particularly in API authorization, authenticated multi-role testing, and modern authentication flows like OAuth2 and JWT. Traditional dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools often fall short in detecting issues such as broken object level authorization (BOLA), broken function level authorization (BFLA), and server-side request forgery (SSRF) because they lack the capability to perform authenticated, multi-role testing at scale. Organizations should audit their current AppSec programs against the 2025 categories to identify coverage gaps before incidents occur.
Why it matters: AppSec practitioners need to evaluate whether their current scanning tools and processes can test authenticated API endpoints across multiple user roles; failure to close these gaps leaves authorization vulnerabilities undetected in production applications.
- Source published
- First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker
Source attribution
Correction
Correction recorded as of .
vulnerabilities
Is Your AppSec Program Built to Close the OWASP Top 10 2025 Coverage Gap?
No summary had been written when this copy was frozen.
- First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker
Source attribution
Correction
Correction recorded as of .
vulnerabilities
Is Your AppSec Program Built to Close the OWASP Top 10 2025 Coverage Gap?
The article argues that many application security programs claim OWASP Top 10 2025 coverage but have significant gaps in practice, particularly in application programming interface (API) authorization testing, authenticated multi-role validation, and modern authentication flows. Traditional dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools were not designed to test broken object level authorization (BOLA), broken function level authorization (BFLA), and server-side request forgery (SSRF) at scale, leaving account takeover vulnerabilities undiscovered. Organizations that audit their coverage gaps against the 2025 categories and implement dedicated API security testing, faster scan cadence, and improved remediation workflows before the next audit cycle will avoid reactive remediation.
Why it matters: AppSec teams relying on legacy scanners face undetected API vulnerabilities that match exploited attack paths; practitioners should map current tools against OWASP 2025 categories to identify coverage blind spots in authentication flows, API authorization, and third-party dependencies before the next audit cycle.
- Source published
- First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker
Source attribution
Correction
Correction recorded as of .
vulnerabilities
Is Your AppSec Program Built to Close the OWASP Top 10 2025 Coverage Gap?
The article argues that many application security programs claim OWASP Top 10 2025 coverage but have significant gaps in practice, particularly in application programming interface (API) authorization testing, authenticated multi-role validation, and modern authentication flows. Traditional dynamic application security testing (DAST) tools were not designed to test broken object level authorization (BOLA), broken function level authorization (BFLA), and server-side request forgery (SSRF) at scale, leaving account takeover vulnerabilities undiscovered. Organizations that audit their coverage gaps against the 2025 categories and implement dedicated API security testing, faster scan cadence, and improved remediation workflows before the next audit cycle will avoid reactive remediation.
Why it matters: AppSec teams relying on legacy scanners face undetected API vulnerabilities that match exploited attack paths; practitioners should map current tools against OWASP 2025 categories to identify coverage blind spots in authentication flows, API authorization, and third-party dependencies before the next audit cycle.
- Source published
- First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker