CYBERSECURITYTRACKER
Permanent story citation

Production data in testing is still common, and Tricentis’ CISO wants it gone

This page keeps the story as Cybersecurity Tracker first published it. If the tracker later corrects it, the correction appears below the original and never replaces it.

Back to newsStory 5059

As cited

Copy frozen at (site build).

Production data in testing is still common, and Tricentis’ CISO wants it gone

No summary had been written when this copy was frozen.

First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Correction

Correction recorded as of .

ai security

Production data in testing is still common, and Tricentis’ CISO wants it gone

Erika Dean, Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) at Tricentis, discusses the persistent practice of using production data in test environments and advocates for alternatives that are now sufficiently mature. She shares how her team identified a prompt injection vulnerability during red-teaming and delayed a release by one week to remediate it. Dean also outlines criteria for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) vendors, noting that vague responses about data location and retention policies lead to rejection.

Why it matters: Security leaders and development teams should assess whether production data is unnecessarily exposed in test environments; Tricentis' experience shows that prompt injection risks in AI-assisted tools require active red-teaming and the willingness to delay releases for fixes.

Source published
First seen by Cybersecurity Tracker

Source attribution

Glossary